The answers should arrive before the patient does
EVAL sends your assessments to patients on their own phone, scores them on arrival, and classifies each result by clinical priority — on the care panel, in the patient chart, and in your team’s inbox.
Delivery
Patients start answering in one tap
A patient taps the link in a text message and answers on the device already in their hand. No account to create, no password to remember.
- Opens straight into the questions, in the phone’s own browser
- The link is an opaque token: no name, no date of birth, no medical detail
- Links expire, and a fresh one can be sent or reissued
Central Clinic: Please complete your tasks ASAP.
me.eval.health/a2c4f6
Scoring
A survey tool can’t score a patient
Screeners, risk scores, and clinical decision rules run on weighted point tables, criteria that branch, structured exam items, sex-dependent scoring, and severity bands where a single answer has to raise a flag on its own. EVAL handles all of it with a full formula language, conditional result rules, and a clinical priority on every result. That is the difference between collecting answers and producing a clinical result someone can act on.
How scoring and priority work- Weighted answers
- Formula expression scoring
- Five severity bands
- Clinical priority computed
Escalation
A critical result reaches your team the moment it is scored
Results are classified by clinical priority as they are scored. Critical and urgent findings send an email to your care team’s shared inbox and sort to the top of the panel, so a finding reaches a person instead of waiting for someone to open a queue.
- Define the clinical priority for each instrument
- Shared alerts, so a team responds rather than one clinician
- Every result carries a status, so you can see what has been reviewed
Every setting
Build it once, run it everywhere
One instrument serves the phone in a patient’s hand, the kiosk in your waiting room, and the clinician’s screen at the point of care. Every response lands in the same place and is scored the same way, whichever route it came in by.
Community library
200+ instruments are already built and scored
Screeners, risk scores and decision rules published by professional societies, academic centers, and clinical researchers. Add one to your library and send it today, or clone it and change what your clinic needs.
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Full nine-item questionnaire for measuring depression severity.
AnticoagulationCHA₂DS₂-VASc Score for Atrial Fibrillation Stroke Risk
Calculates stroke risk for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Emergency medicineCanadian C-Spine Rule
Clinically clears cervical spine fracture without imaging.
Patient-reported outcomesSF-36 Health Survey
The most widely used generic quality-of-life instrument in clinical research, scored across eight domains.
PulmonologyCOPD Assessment Test (CAT)
Grades COPD symptom burden and its impact on daily life.
HepatologyFIB-4 Index for Liver Fibrosis
Estimates the likelihood of advanced fibrosis from routine labs, without biopsy.
Authoring
Translate literature into digital instruments today
Kelly Rudd, PharmD, authored this suite of PAD instruments with our clinical team and owns them outright. No ticket, no IT backlog, no custom EHR code.
- The AI builder drafts it from your documents or a description
- Intuitive drag-and-drop builder
- Start from 200+ published community instruments
OSU Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) Screening Tool
Assess & Diagnosis PAD in the Outpatient Setting
OSU Center for Health Sciences CardiologyPeripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) Symptom Checker
Review of symptoms to assess for exertional leg symptoms, lower extremity rest pain and physical signs suggestive of PAD
OSU Center for Health Sciences CardiologyOSU Antithrombotic PAD Management Post Revascularization
Antithrombotic Management in Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) post procedure differs from PAD without an intervention.
OSU Center for Health Sciences CardiologyOSU Antithrombotic Management of Asymptomatic PAD Without Revascularization
Antithrombotic Management in Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) post procedure differs from PAD without an intervention.
OSU Center for Health SciencesEvidence
Author and publish a clinical instrument in hours, not months
We measured how long it took to build 27 instruments that clinicians authored themselves, from the first edit to the moment patients could answer. The median was 17.5 hours. Custom EHR development of a comparable tool typically takes 6 to 12 months.
2026